[alicebot-general] XAIML

Dr. Rich Wallace drwallace at gmail.com
Fri May 19 01:43:41 PDT 2006


There already exists a body, the AIML Architecture Committee, for
setting the AIML standard (co-incidentally co-founded by Noel Bush).

On 5/18/06, mehri <foreverlinux at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Perhaps it is about time to assemble a task team to
> > update the AIML standard? I doubt we'd be short of
> > candidates. If anything, this would be a fairly more
> > positive attitude than going around pointing
> > fingers.
>
> I think the way Noel is going forward with xAIML
> compliments the AIML standard and committe.  If new
> AIML tags are approved they'll go into the xAIML_0.
>
> Now if I decide I cannot support the new AIML tag I
> would use my xAIML_Frank where my xAIML says "no" it
> does not support the feature.
>
> In all honesty I think that xAIML_0 should be frozen
> at the current standard and if any new tags are added
> they'd be an increment of xAIML, say xAIML_1 so the
> current interpreters while upgrading to the new tag
> would have to swap out to xAIML_1.
>
> It'd make it easier to spot interpreters which haven't
> upgraded yet they'd have no changes and be at xAIML_0.
>
> The committe should always be around to draft new
> revisions of the standard AIML set but experimental
> add-ons can always be break-away parts of
> xAIML_whatever and if they gain popularity they'd
> eventually probably be moved by the committe to the
> standard set.
>
> I've seen a similiar process with C++ and Boost which
> works very well.  Boost is a set of add on libraries
> in which well liked parts of it eventually get added
> to the core C++ standard.
>
>
>
> --- Helio Perroni Filho <xperroni at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > --- "Dr. Rich Wallace" <drwallace at alicebot.org>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > Pronounced "Shame-L"
> >
> > Aw man, that's no good.
> >
> > I've read Noel's "meta-standard" proposition and it
> > seems pretty reasonable stuff to me. I understand
> > that
> > Dr. Wallace would rather him working on the next
> > version of the AIML standard, but I honestly think
> > that blaming him for its currently frozen state is a
> > bit off the mark.
> >
> > Perhaps it is about time to assemble a task team to
> > update the AIML standard? I doubt we'd be short of
> > candidates. If anything, this would be a fairly more
> > positive attitude than going around pointing
> > fingers.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards for all,
> > Helio Perroni Filho
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________
> >
> > Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail: 1GB de espaço,
> > alertas de e-mail no celular e anti-spam realmente
> > eficaz.
> > http://br.info.mail.yahoo.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the alicebot-general mailing list
> > Reply to alicebot-general at list.alicebot.org
> > Unsubscribe and change preferences at
> >
> http://list.alicebot.org/mailman/listinfo/alicebot-general
> > Learn netiquette at
> > http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html
> > Learn to read at http://www.literacy.org/
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> This is the alicebot-general mailing list
> Reply to alicebot-general at list.alicebot.org
> Unsubscribe and change preferences at http://list.alicebot.org/mailman/listinfo/alicebot-general
> Learn netiquette at http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html
> Learn to read at http://www.literacy.org/
>


More information about the alicebot-general mailing list