[alicebot-archcomm] [motion] <shuffle>

[Jon Baer]

Sounds good to me, where are we going?  Bahamas?  Tahiti?  Virgin Islands?

- Jon

"Dr. Richard S. Wallace" wrote:

> Uh, we...are...taking....a....summer...vacation.
>
> Thanks
>
> Rich
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Noel Bush" <noel@alicebot.org>
> To: "Alicebot and AIML Architecture Committee"
> <alicebot-archcomm@list.alicebot.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:17 AM
> Subject: Re: [alicebot-archcomm] [motion] <shuffle>
>
> > On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 19:27, Conan Callen wrote:
> > > 1. Will the <random> remain, or will <shuffle> obsolete <random>
> >
> > I think <random> should remain.  I actually think that <shuffle> will
> > turn out to be more useful than <random>, but there's no reason to
> > remove <random>.
> >
> > > 2. When the deck is shuffled, it is possible that the last card will be
> the
> > > first card after the shuffle. If this is not the desired behavior, you
> might
> > > insert some text that says something to the effect "while insuring that
> the
> > > last li child returned will not be the first li child returned after the
> > > shuffle" at the point marked by <INSERTED HERE>.
> > >
> > > then the status of the shuffle is reset  as though none of its li
> children
> > > have been returned to the current user by the AIML interpreter for
> > > the current bot <INSERTED HERE>, and a selection is made
> > > according to the first rule.
> >
> > Yes, that's an interesting point.
> >
> > > 3. Also the link to the Aiml schema on
> > > http://alicebot.org/committees/aimlSchema.html is broken.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > alicebot-archcomm mailing list
> > alicebot-archcomm@list.alicebot.org
> > http://list.alicebot.org/mailman/listinfo/alicebot-archcomm
>
> _______________________________________________
> alicebot-archcomm mailing list
> alicebot-archcomm@list.alicebot.org
> http://list.alicebot.org/mailman/listinfo/alicebot-archcomm