[alicebot-archcomm] AIML 2.0 and POSIX?

[Dr. Richard S. Wallace]

How about forming a "Vision" subcommittee of those interested in this deep
issue?  The AIML Vision committee could report back to us with a concrete
proposal.

Rich

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eugene Lebedev" <maineugene@yahoo.com>
To: <alicebot-archcomm@list.alicebot.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: [alicebot-archcomm] AIML 2.0 and POSIX?


> I think it could not be a problem to resolve POSIX issue
> and put it as AIML 1.02 (for example).
>
> But Keith re-raised a very good question regarding vision for AIML future.
> I think it's important to form clear vision regarding next major version
of
> AIML. I was trying to put together actors and their goals. I will be happy
> to continue this activity if I have a support from ArchComm members.
>
> May be we have to formulate a motion "Vision for AIML future"
>
> Eugene
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dr. Richard S. Wallace" <drwallace@alicebot.org>
> To: <alicebot-archcomm@list.alicebot.org>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [alicebot-archcomm] AIML 2.0 and POSIX?
>
>
> > No vision.
> >
> > AIML 2.0, whatever that means, is probably a long way off.  We have
> adopted
> > incremental version number of 0.01 for the standard and so far we have
> > reached 1.01.   If we manage to make 99 more incremental changes, we
would
> > reach 2.0.
> >
> > The only other conceivable reason to jump to the next integer would be a
> > major change in the language, and I don't even want to speculate what
that
> > might be.  The question of adopting the Posix standard is certainly not
> such
> > a "major" change.
> >
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Keith Cooley" <kcooley@coolware.com>
> > To: <alicebot-archcomm@list.alicebot.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:42 AM
> > Subject: Re: [alicebot-archcomm] AIML 2.0 and POSIX?
> >
> >
> > > As a new member of this committee I wonder if there is any statement
of
> > > goals or a vision for AIML 2.0? Without such a context I find it
> difficult
> > > to evaluate, in particular, the proposal for extending AIML to include
> > > POSIX type functionality, but also in general any proposals.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Keith Cooley
> > > President of Coolware, Inc.
> > > mobile: (650) 906 7933
> > > office:   (650) 322 4722
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > alicebot-archcomm mailing list
> > > alicebot-archcomm@list.alicebot.org
> > > http://list.alicebot.org/mailman/listinfo/alicebot-archcomm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > alicebot-archcomm mailing list
> > alicebot-archcomm@list.alicebot.org
> > http://list.alicebot.org/mailman/listinfo/alicebot-archcomm
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> alicebot-archcomm mailing list
> alicebot-archcomm@list.alicebot.org
> http://list.alicebot.org/mailman/listinfo/alicebot-archcomm